← The record

Atomoxetine HydrochlorideAPO-ATOMOXETINE

Recommended NeurologyAuthority Required

treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosed between the ages of 6 and 18 years inclusive, by a paediatrician or psychiatrist according to the DSM-IV criteria

6
Submissions
4 resub
2005–08
On the record
$15k–75k
ICER range
4 sourced ICERs · 2005–2006
Not modelled
Cost basis

Decisions on record

5 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2016 Recommended Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Strattera® Eli Lilly Australia Pty Limited Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder To request that the current Authority Required listing for atomoxetine be changed to authority required (STREAMLINED) and the restriction wording be altered. no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2008 Recommended Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Meeting Jul 2008 Not recommended Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Meeting Nov 2006 Recommended Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Access path

6 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · APO-ATOMOXETINE

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2005
    Not recommended

    unacceptable and uncertain cost-effectiveness, uncertain utility valuations in economic model, concerns about…

  3. Nov 2005
    Not recommended

    unacceptable and uncertain cost-effectiveness, reliability of the economic model considered uncertain, concerns about…

  4. Jul 2006
    Not recommended

    uncertain cost-effectiveness due to unreliable economic model assumptions; biased delayed response assumption (50.4%…

  5. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2006
    Recommended · restricted

    ICER dropped $75,000 → $45,000 (-40%)

  6. Jul 2008
    Recommended · restricted

    Listing: Authority Required → Authority required

  7. Jul 2008
    Recommended · restricted

    Listing: Authority Required → Authority required

  8. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

4 sourced ICERs · 2005–2006

No economic evaluation was presented in the submission

The PBAC recommended listing on a cost effectiveness basis over placebo at the new price proposed. The PBAC accepted that there is a clinical need for this product and that the restriction appropriately targets those patients most likely to benefit from treatment. PBAC · 2006
ICER uncertain ×2Economic model disputed ×2Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

Populationpatients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosed between the ages of 6 and 18 years inclusive, by a paediatrician or psychiatrist according to the DSM-IV criteria

Submission history

6 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2008 Recommended · restricted
Jul 2008 Recommended · restricted RCT
Nov 2006 Recommended · restricted placebo $15k–45k RCT · Other
Jul 2006 Not recommended Placebo $45k–75k RCT · QoL
Nov 2005 Not recommended placebo $15k–45k Meta-analysis · ADHDRS-IV
Nov 2005 Not recommended placebo $15k–45k Meta-analysis · ADHDRS-IV response

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to ages 6–18 years, excluding adults covered by TGA label; requires specialist diagnosis (paediatrician or psychiatrist).