Disease index

medullary thyroid cancer

Oncology · 2026–2026

1decision
1medicine
1carried consumer input
8individual submissions

Every decision

MedicineMeetingOutcomeConsumer input
selpercatinib Treatment of locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in patients with RET variants who have unresectable disease and documented disease… Mar 2026 Deferred 8 individuals Rare Cancers Australia

Who spoke

Rare Cancers Australia

What the PBS pays

$1M in government benefit over 2024–25, across 95 services.

This is spend on the medicines considered for this condition, not spend on the disease. A medicine used for several conditions is counted in full under each, so figures across conditions add to more than national PBS expenditure.

MedicineGovernment benefit
selpercatinib $0.6M

Appraised elsewhere

NICE, in England and Wales, has appraised 2 technologies for this condition, recommending 1 and declining 1. A different committee, a different population and a different price: this is what has been looked at there, not a verdict on what happened here.

TechnologyAppraisalOutcomeDate
vandetanibVandetanib for treating medullary thyroid cancer TA550 not recommended 2018-12
cabozantinibCabozantinib for treating medullary thyroid cancer TA516 recommended restricted 2018-03

Registered, not subsidised

Medicines on the ARTG for this condition with no PBAC record at all. Registration and subsidy are separate decisions: a medicine can be legally available in Australia and never have been put to the committee.

MedicineOn the ARTG sinceRegistrations
vandetanibCAPRELSA vandetanib 100mg film coated tablet blister pack 2013 1

The ARTG export holds current registrations only, so the year is the earliest entry still on the register rather than a first-registration date. The condition here comes from the registered label, which is usually broader than the population a sponsor asks to have subsidised.

Conditions are classified by a language model from the indication text of each submission, so an individual label here can be wrong. Consumer input is read from the document's own consumer comments section: 1 of 1 decisions since 2014 carried some. Silence means no comment reached the committee through that facility, not that nobody was affected. More on how this was built.