Disease index

diabetic macular oedema

Ophthalmology · 2013–2024

12decisions
5medicines
7carried consumer input
13individual submissions

Every decision

MedicineMeetingOutcomeConsumer input
aflibercept Treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Aflibercept 8 mg intravitreal injection is assessed as a higher-dose… May 2024 Recommended with restriction 1 individuals Macular Disease Foundation Australia
aflibercept Treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Nov 2024 Recommended with restriction none received
faricimab Treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO). May 2022 Recommended with restriction input received Macular Disease Foundation Australia · Diabetes Australia
fluocinolone acetonide Treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who are unsuitable for, contraindicated to, or have failed treatment with vascular endothelial growth… Mar 2020 Recommended with restriction unclear
fluocinolone acetonide Treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who are unsuitable for, contraindicated to, or have failed treatment with vascular endothelial growth… Nov 2020 Recommended with restriction input received
dexamethasone Treatment of vision impairment due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DME) in patients with pseudophakic eyes for whom VEGF inhibition is not the… Mar 2016 Recommended with restriction 2 individuals Macular Disease Foundation
dexamethasone Treatment of vision impairment due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DME) in patients with pseudophakic lens or scheduled for cataract surgery. Mar 2015 Not recommended 2 individuals
ranibizumab Treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME), as diagnosed by fluorescein angiography, in patients with best corrected visual acuity… Jul 2014 Recommended with restriction 8 individuals
ranibizumab Visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) and macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Mar 2014 Deferred unclear
aflibercept Treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME). Nov 2014 Recommended with restriction input received
ranibizumab Treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema, as diagnosed by fluorescein angiography. Mar 2013 Not recommended unclear
ranibizumab Treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME), as diagnosed by fluorescein angiography, in patients with best corrected visual acuity… Nov 2013 Not recommended no section in document

Who spoke

Macular Disease Foundation Australia · Macular Disease Foundation · Diabetes Australia

What the PBS pays

$747M in government benefit over 2024–25, across 1,016,148 services.

This is spend on the medicines considered for this condition, not spend on the disease. A medicine used for several conditions is counted in full under each, so figures across conditions add to more than national PBS expenditure.

MedicineGovernment benefit
aflibercept $506.1M
faricimab $134.3M
ranibizumab $91.6M
dexamethasone $14.5M

Appraised elsewhere

NICE, in England and Wales, has appraised 6 technologies for this condition, recommending 6 . A different committee, a different population and a different price: this is what has been looked at there, not a verdict on what happened here.

TechnologyAppraisalOutcomeDate
fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implantFluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for treating chronic diabetic macular oedema TA953 recommended restricted 2024-03
dexamethasone intravitreal implantDexamethasone intravitreal implant for treating diabetic macular oedema TA824 recommended restricted 2022-09
brolucizumabBrolucizumab for treating diabetic macular oedema TA820 recommended restricted 2022-08
faricimabFaricimab for treating diabetic macular oedema TA799 recommended restricted 2022-06
afliberceptAflibercept for treating diabetic macular oedema TA346 recommended restricted 2015-07
ranibizumabRanibizumab for treating diabetic macular oedema TA274 recommended restricted 2013-02

Conditions are classified by a language model from the indication text of each submission, so an individual label here can be wrong. Consumer input is read from the document's own consumer comments section: 7 of 10 decisions since 2014 carried some. Silence means no comment reached the committee through that facility, not that nobody was affected. More on how this was built.