Disease index

chronic pain

Pain · 2012–2025

6decisions
5medicines
2carried consumer input
6individual submissions

Every decision

MedicineMeetingOutcomeConsumer input
methadone Chronic severe disabling pain and severe disabling pain in patients who have failed alternative pain management therapies and require daily continuous… Jul 2025 Recommended with restriction 3 individuals
Secondary annual review of ongoing treatment with PBS subsidised opioid medications for non-palliative patients with chronic pain who have received combined… Dec 2020 Not recommended no section in document
oxycodone hydrochloride + naloxone hydrochloride Chronic severe disabling pain unresponsive to non-narcotic analgesics. Three additional strengths (2.5 mg/1.25 mg, 15 mg/7.5 mg, and 30 mg/15 mg) sought to… Nov 2015 Recommended no section in document
oxycodone Chronic pain management requiring opioid therapy in patients for whom modified-release oxycodone is indicated. Nov 2014 Noted 3 individuals Pharmaceutical Society of Australia · Australian Pain Society · Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia
tapentadol Treatment of chronic severe disabling pain not responding to non-narcotic analgesics. Nov 2013 Recommended with restriction unclear
tapentadol Chronic severe disabling pain not responding to non-narcotic analgesics. Mar 2012 Not recommended unclear

Who spoke

Pharmaceutical Society of Australia · Australian Pain Society · Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia

What the PBS pays

$341M in government benefit over 2024–25, across 9,555,207 services.

This is spend on the medicines considered for this condition, not spend on the disease. A medicine used for several conditions is counted in full under each, so figures across conditions add to more than national PBS expenditure.

MedicineGovernment benefit
oxycodone hydrochloride + naloxone hydrochloride $163.8M
oxycodone $117.7M
tapentadol $49.9M
methadone $9.6M

Conditions are classified by a language model from the indication text of each submission, so an individual label here can be wrong. Consumer input is read from the document's own consumer comments section: 2 of 4 decisions since 2014 carried some. Silence means no comment reached the committee through that facility, not that nobody was affected. More on how this was built.